Saturday, September 22, 2012

Public Asked To Record Fraudulent Patents

Members of the open are being asked by the US Patent Office to help weed out fraudulent obvious applications.

It wants the open to minister to a website that will mark applications for patents on technologies that have already been invented.

People will moreover be able to dwindle up applications on the site that they regard are bogus.

The site runs Google program to finds examples of comparison inventions - "prior art" - to filter out counterfeit claims.

The website, called Ask Patents, will be run by US definite Stack Exchange that has a follow record of working QA websites.

"Our hope is that Ask Patents will lower the number of patents incorrectly postulated for obvious, plagiarized non-inventions, particularly around software," mentioned Stack Exchange team leader Joel Spolsky in a blogpost about the site .

In the past a few people and organisations have used the endowment of a obvious to win money from firms that do not have the financial resources to launch authorised action against such claims.

Mr Spolsky mentioned that nonetheless US obvious office worked hard they typically had reduction than 22.5 hours so outlay on any application.

This done downright searches for all previous art all but unfit and meant many "trivial" patents slipped through.

He mentioned Ask Patents would be a "collaborative effort" that would let any person analyze obvious applications.

"It is gap up a routine that has been conducted at the back closed doors for over 200 years," he wrote.

The site will moreover deed as a card file of previous art to make it simpler to mark when applications are filed for innovations that already exist, or have already been granted.

In an talk with technology publication Ars Technica, Mr Spolsky mentioned he thought that probing for previous art would be the trickiest segment of the entire project.

"However," he told the tech headlines site, "the fact is, there are may hundreds of obvious applications every week that aren't loyal inventions."

No comments:

Post a Comment