SAN JOSE, California - Shortly before the justice pennyless for lunch on Tuesday during the Apple v. Samsung trial, Samsung's authorised group strike the jury box with an attack of technical sum on the patents it believes Apple is infringing. One juror obviously began nodding off. The tinge and calm of the be evidence of was a sheer difference to Apple's gap statements progressing in the day, that were evidently written to allure to the jurors' emotions.
Samsung profession Charlie Verhoeven conducted the gap statement. "There's a eminence between blurb success and inventing something," Verhoeven said. Verhoeven showed a preference of inscription designs that gimlet a charming likeness to the rectangular, minimalist look of the iPad - and a few of these tablets antiquated back to 1994.
"Apple didn't invent the rectangular-shaped form reason you keep seeing," Verhoeven said. Harkening back to the words that Samsung's product arch told Wired , "They have no correct to affirm a corner on spherical corners on a rectilinear screen."
Verhoeven showed a handful of slides illustrating the extended operation of Samsung cellphones and smartphones before the iPhone was introduced in 2007, and then after. After the iPhone, Verhoeven said, consumers simply longed for sweets bar-shaped phones with a considerable touchscreen on the face, and the whole attention changed toward that. "Is that infringement?" Verhoeven asked. "No, it's competition. It's providing to the consumer what the consumer wants, and that's what Samsung has done."
He mentioned that it's innate for companies to look to the contest for inspiration, and even supposing examples of inner Apple papers dissecting and deliberating competing smartphone and tablets in the space, inclusive Samsung's. And as with all competitors in the stream inscription space - slides enclosed iPad-like tablets from Acer, Toshiba, and others - Verhoeven mentioned Samsung's products aren't the source of any " traffic skirt " dilution. That is, Samsung's products aren't causing difficulty for consumers in the marketplace.
After giving an general outlook of Samsung's story in the mobile space, Verhoeven remarkable that Samsung is a leading components retailer for Apple, providing tools similar to the principal memory, spark memory, and applications processor is to iPhone, and the Retina manifestation is to new iPad. "Apparently Apple thinks Samsung has invented something, to put its products in its phone," Verhoeven said.
Samsung outlayed the bulk of its gap matter going over both Apple patents and its own patents. Verhoeven sharp out how Samsung's phones do not add the stable features of Apple's pattern patents (for example, an even bezel opposite the edge of the device. He moreover went in to larger item explaining Samsung's patents to uncover how they are application patents vital to 3G delivery functionality.
Verhoeven moreover took infrequent pot shots at Apple. For example, he mentioned Samsung's 3G patents are "much more essential than small things you can do on a touchscreen." Verhoeven closed Samsung's be evidence of by saying, "Samsung hasn't completed anything wrong. Samsung is an innovator, a competitor. If anything, what you have here is transgression by Apple."
The Apple v. Samsung hearing will interruption until this forthcoming Friday. We can't wait for to listen to what comes next.
No comments:
Post a Comment