A argumentative law definite that sent letters to purported unlawful record sharers has been told it cannot tumble its cases to "avoid open scrutiny".
ACS:Law contacted thousands of people accusing them of illegally downloading cinema and songs and rigorous payments of 500 to prevent justice action.
Cases against 26 of them proceeded, before the company attempted to lift out of lawsuit at the final minute.
Now a panel of judges had criticised the definite for its methods.
"I cannot suppose a network improved written to emanate disincentives to assessment the problems in court," mentioned Judge Ian Birss at the Patents County Court in London.
The box stems from a letter-writing promotion by ACS:Law and its associate company MediaCAT, that sent an undisclosed number of notices to purported record sharers rigorous they pay a excellent or face the awaiting of dear authorised action.
Some of the contacted paid up, but it after that emerged that the two companies had been receiving 65% of the fines collected, with the minority of the allowance being transfered back to the
No comments:
Post a Comment