Twitter could turn a utilitarian source of data about health, according to US researchers.
Two John Hopkins University P.C. scientists complicated 1.5 million health-related tweets between May 2009 and October 2010.
It supposing an perception in to how Twitter users noticed a operation of illnesses and how they went about treating themselves.
It moreover showed that many chose the incorrect drug to plunge into familiar ailments.
"Tweets showed us that a few major medical misperceptions exist out there," mentioned PhD tyro Michael J. Paul who helped run the investigate project.
"We found that a few people tweeted that they were receiving antibiotics is to flu," he said. "But antibiotics do not work on the flu, that is a virus, and this use could minister to the flourishing antibiotic insurgency problems."
To find health-
The P.C. module was taught to negligence phrases that did not unequivocally describe to health, even even though they contained a word ordinarily used in a illness context - such as "high cost of gas is a stomach-ache for my business".
In about 200,000 of the health-related tweets, publicly existing data meant the researchers could pick out that US state they came from.
This authorised them to pick out illness trends opposite the US.
"We were able to see that the allergy period proposed progressing in the warmer states and after that in the Midwest and Northeast," mentioned Professor Mark Dredze.
But both scientists concurred that there were stipulations to what they could learn about illness problems around Twitter.
Often they found that tweeters did not criticism more than once on a specific ailment.
"We could usually learn what people were peaceful to share and you regard there's a confine to what people are peaceful to share on Twitter," mentioned Mr Paul.
No comments:
Post a Comment