The Winklevoss brothers have re-started their long-running authorised disagreement with Facebook and its team leader Mark Zuckerberg.
Just days after dropping a paramount justice action, the twins filed a uninformed legal case against the company.
It claims that Facebook "intentionally or inadvertently suppressed evidence" during their formerly litigation.
Originally, Tyler and Cameron indicted Mr Zuckerberg of hidden their thought to emanate the site.
The story of the enmity shaped the core of the 2010 movie "The Social Network".
The quarrel dates from 2003 when the Winklevosses hired Mr Zuckerberg to write ethics for their ConnectU site whilst at Harvard.
He never did, but instead set up Facebook, that rapidly became a success around the world.
A justice case over who did what was settled in 2008 when the parties concluded on a financial settlement, reportedly value around $65m (41m).
In January 2011 the Winklevosses attempted to free the case, looking more money. However, a US appeals justice ruled in April that they would have to agree to the settlement.
The twins primarily mentioned they would allure against the settlement, but motionless this week not to search for that authorised avenue.
In the many new fit filed on Thursday with the US District Court of Massachusetts, the Winklevosses and their business associate Divya Narendra mentioned that Facebook hid a few major data from them during agreement proceedings.
The twins mentioned that Mr Zuckerberg did not divulge a few critical papers in regards to the attribute between him and the brothers whilst they were at Harvard.
Facebook's outward give advice Neel Chatterjee mentioned in a statement: "These are aged and groundless allegations that have been deliberate and deserted previously by the courts."
No comments:
Post a Comment