Thursday, September 29, 2011

FCC Seeks Criticism On Closed Captioning Doing For IP-delivered Video

You are here: Home Page » News » FCC seeks criticism on closed captioning doing for IP-delivered video

Sep 28, 2011 3:35 PM, By Phil Kurz

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) Sept. 19 looking criticism on proposals directed at providing the deaf and hard of conference with closed captions on IP-delivered video programming, if that calm was shown on TV with captions.

The assignment released the NPRM to perform a necessity of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 that directs the group to correct its manners to order closed captions on established IP-delivered programming. The NPRM moreover seeks criticism on gadgets theme to the act.

The assignment has until Jan. 12, 2012, to correct its regulations to require the ability of closed captioning and any technical standards, protocols and procedures vital for delivery of closed captions around IP so that gadgets have the ability to manifestation the captions.

The NPRM asks for explanation on changes to FCC manners that would want the owners of video programming to send heading files along with module files for IP-delivered video programs to distributors and providers. It moreover seeks explanation on requiring both module distributors and providers to capacitate digest or pass by of all compulsory heading files to finish users, together with on requiring the high quality of IP-delivered captions to be at least the same high quality as captions for TV.

Among the questions the assignment seeks submit on is the must be mention a specific typical is to rotate format for IP-delivered video programming. The NPRM proposes that the group give up from naming a delivery format for IP-delivered video programming to allow is to "maximum amount of technological innovation." The NPRM records that the SMPTE Timed Text typical as an rotate format has been recommended, but mentioned it is not proposing to adopt a specific format since an rotate format is routinely specified as segment of bargaining between video module owners and distributors and providers of that programming.

No comments:

Post a Comment