Some days ago a on the Arduino Forum [ jezuz ] common a couple that we found unequivocally downright in selecting amid the not similar flavours of Sharp Rangefinders.
Over the years, Sharp has introduced a family of infra-red detectors. These detectors brag a tiny package, very little stream consumption, and a accumulation of outlay options. This essay offers an general outlook of the assorted types, data on interfacing them, and hints and tips.
I've always found this sensor very utilitarian and fitting for a lot of projects. One of his cons is a reduction sensibility towards black objects. [ cr0sh ] explains it:
That's since black soaks up IR (and a entire horde of other frequencies in the manifest operation – hence, black); a ping-style ultrasonic sensor further has problems with non-uniform surfaces, and more severely with soothing objects similar to pillows (or other sound-absorbing material).
There is no a "do it all" sensor for ranging, sadly (with the difference of presumably LIDAR joined with endless mapping and estimate – not something that is inexpensive or even doable with usually an Arduino). So you must be mix sensors and then confederate the data that they create so your network can earn a improved thought of what is "out there".
read-on the review to the [ Arduino Forum ] source [ Acroname ]
This access was postedby d.gomba@arduino.cc on Wednesday, November 17th, 2010 and is filed beneath Sharp RangeFinder , sensors .You can follow any responses to this access by the RSS 2.0 feed.You can leave a reply , or trackback from your own site.
No comments:
Post a Comment