Emergency Response

You are here: Home Page » Infrastructure » Emergency reply

Dec 2, 2011 5:20 PM, By Ned Soseman

A couple of new headlines things held my concern and imagination. Maybe you noticed, too. Both have to do with crisis situations.

First was the glow warning about 10 seconds in to the NBC Nightly News on Nov. 29. If you didn't see it, Brian Williams rubbed it similar to any skilled headlines anchor who isn't right away in jeopardy by fume or abandon would do, and the uncover went on. Eyeballs rolled and intelligent babble covered the warning and what contingency have been a full-scale behind-the-scenes meltdown. It was an annoying short time for NBC, but the uncover went on as if nothing happened.

Fire alarms always hint debates in radio stations. Nearly all services have lots of glow safety equipment, inclusive sprinklers, extinguishers and glow alarms, and many report a periodic glow cavalcade every so often. Most local glow departments and insurance carriers demand on it.

Usually, glow drills are scheduled around live newscasts and productions. But in the suggestion of Murphy's Law and all that creates broadcasting so ample fun, not this time at NBC. As the warning was blaring, Williams confirmed his on-air cool. He explained, "There is no risk to us." And he mentioned the warning was a scheduled "announcement."

My subject to you is: How do people in your trickery conflict to glow alarms? Does everybody take them seriously? Does your hire have a process in place defining who leaves the building, who stays and who creates that decision? These questions are over the range of this newsletter, but the NBC e.g. should be deliberate or at least mentioned at the next subdepartment head discussion at your station. Lives and lawsuits could cling to in the balance.

What's more interesting than a RWT?
Broadcasters have been rehearsing for a national crisis for scarcely 60 years. Emergency broadcasting was strictly introduced on Dec. 10, 1951, when the Control of Electromagnetic Radiation system, well known as CONELRAD, was determined by President Harry Truman. The initial thought was to head off challenger bombers from homing in on cities by using radio or TV transmitters as beacons. It was moreover ostensible to supply necessary polite invulnerability data to the broad public. The technical concept of CONELRAD was simple. A CONELRAD inform or assessment consisted of shutting the receiver off for 5 seconds, returning to the air for 5 seconds, once again shutting off for 5 seconds, and then transmitting a tinge for 15 seconds. Of course, not all transmitters could hoop that type of plate-on, plate-off, plate-on stress. This was but a of the first recognized problems of CONELRAD.